Saturday, July 29, 2006

Is Preaching really about story?

This question was offered up to me like a slow pitch softball in a lunch conversation last week. The question is not really that easy, per say, its just that the person who asked it had no idea what they were in for when they asked ME :-)

I'd love to hear some people thoughts on the role of story and narrative and preaching. I have some thoughts, which I will share as we continue, but I'm curious as to what you all might think. To get things started there are two quotes I'd like to throw out there:

"Truth naked and cold had been turned away from every door in the village. Her nakedness frightened the people. When Parable found her, she was huddled in a corner, shivering and hungry. Taking pity on her, Parable gathered her up and took her home. There, she dressed Truth in story, warmed her and sent her out again. Clothed in story, Truth knocked again at the villagers’ doors and was readily welcomed into the people’s houses. They invited her to eat at their table and warm herself by the fire."

- Jewish teaching story


And this offering which comes from an interview from the infamous "Wittenburg Door" magazine with one of the greatest story tellers of our generation, Garrison Keillor.

Door: Any suggestions on making sermons better?
K: Yes. First, I think that people want to hear the gospel in the form of a story. There’s a story at the heart of every sermon. I think sermons fail when they take that story, stick it in a corner, and make it into a lecture. That won’t work for people.
Door: Why not?
K: A story allows people to come into it. You can somehow envision yourself as a participant in a story. It engages the imagination in a way that a lecture does not. In order for a lecture to draw people in, it really has to be a sustained experience. Twenty minutes is definitely not enough time.
But a story has a magical power to draw people into it. If you simply describe specific details of a landscape, if you crate a street in a small town in Midwest in January on a Sunday afternoon in North Dakota with the drifts plowed up high along the sides of the road and steam coming out of the chimneys of a few homes on the edge of town, and beyond that a great sea of snow on fields perfectly flat and broken by tree lines around farms – you’ve just created a landscape that someone will be imagine himself in. And then something else can happen.
Door: What?
K: You can draw him out of himself and into this place in the imagination. The story of Job draws us into it. The parable of the prodigal son is easy for me to imagine anyway. Most of the other stories in the New Testament draw people in, as well.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I listened to a preacher the other day abusing yet another passage of Scripture. Wandered totally off the track and made the point of the passage to be his own point/opinion/truth. One of the statements he made about the Bible to a group of juvenile delinquents who attend church service simply to get out of their rooms was that the Bible is the Word of God and everything else is just man's word. Who are you going to listen to, he asked, God's word or man's? At this point I almost said, Ok then, everyone to your rooms, this MAN is done speaking. But I refrained.

The problem with truth is that we're so anxious to impose our version of it that we too often miss it altogether. Lectures are this way: a man's/woman's/misc person's truth logically or illogically justified before the masses.

Stories on the other hand, although they can certainly be embellished and exaggerated, are easier to keep to form. They are bigger than our opinions, so big that we often get caught up in them, picturing ourselves as the characters in them...which is perhaps the whole point of the Gospel "story". And so I would suggest that it is when we mind the story and develop new ways of telling the same story that we resist the urge to shove truth in a corner for our own manner of being.

{jeff edmondson} said...

I find it funny that with much bravado, a lot of the guys I know who call themselves preachers try to make a severe delineation between making a point via illustration in their sermons and then revealing to their audience what they are counting as truth. It's as if they think people won't get the point through the illustration without them pulling out the point and then hammering it home over and over again.

A case in point: I was recently in a small group meeting where the discussion of the point at hand was very avid. The group members were hammering through the different angles from a variety of standpoints, telling personal stories and thoughts to bring about their point of view. Everything was clicking so perfectly. Except, the leader, who had his own agenda of what the point of the conversation had to conclude as, abruptly halted the continued discussions and then began preaching, nailing home his own agenda of what the Scripture supposedly meant. There were no illustrations to support his agenda. It was a very uncompassionate, raised voice delivery. He even litterally hammered the furnature in front of him with his fist a couple of times to drive his point home. His conclussion: "This is what the Word of God says, and if you have a problem with it, you don't have a problem with me. You have a problem with God."

Asside from the fact that he was completely off base theologically, the fact that he was so hard-nosed about his interpretation of the Scripture was totally repulsive to the rest of us. It completely ended the conversation. But the point is, had he even backed up his ideas with a few stories to support his standpoint, people might very well have bought into what he was trying to say.

We live in a metaphorically-driven society. Trying to deliver truth without illustration of story is not only stupid, it just doesn't work.

Brian said...

I find it fascinating that both comments talk about truth. I too think that its too often that we think that our version and interpretation of truth is the ONLY way. Why is it that we are so afraid of how God may actually speak to people through His Story? Perhaps we aren't telling His Story? Perhaps we don't trust God enough because we feel like we have to be in control?

I wonder too if there is something more than just illustrations for us to use. Is it possible that God's story is the best story and doesn't need much of our help in the way of pithy saying, antecdotes and silliness. Thoughts???/